0113 440 0020 Get Started

Published on 30/08/2025

Should I Use AI for This? Maybe Not.

By Peter Holroyde

“I’m being asked all the time about using AI by people at the moment. My answer is usually, ‘yes, but tell me what for’.”

And about 70% of the time, once we talk it through, it turns out that automation is actually the right fit.

There’s a lot of noise around artificial intelligence right now – especially large language models (LLMs). The hype machine is in full swing, and it’s tempting to throw an LLM at every business problem that smells even remotely like admin.

But not everything needs a brain.

In this post, I’ll walk through:

By the end, you’ll hopefully have a clearer idea of what’s fit for purpose – and where business process management tools (like the ones we build) can help.

Automation vs AI: what suits what?

Here’s a simple comparison table to break it down:

“The best systems don’t ‘use AI.’ They use the right tool for the job.”

But nothing’s perfect…

Both automation and AI have their limitations:

Automation

  • Rigid once set up
  • Brittle with unexpected input or changes
  • Can be costly to design if the logic is complex

AI (LLMs)

  • Can hallucinate incorrect information
  • Vulnerable to prompt injection if inputs are not clean or controlled
  • Tone deaf at times – especially in sensitive contexts
  • Costs can add up, especially with high usage of premium models

That last point on costs is worth digging into…

What does it cost?

Automation is usually more expensive to set up (developer time, system design), but once in place, it’s cheap and fast to run.

AI is cheaper to start (API calls, minimal setup), but can be expensive to run at scale – especially if using large, high-quality LLMs.

Smart design mixes both:

A worked example: making customer feedback scale

Let’s say you’re running an online shop.

You have a small customer service team who deal with feedback from your customers. Here’s their current process:

That works fine when there are 5-10 bits of feedback a week.

But what about 100? Or 1,000?

Enter: automation, AI, and humans – working together

We rebuilt the process in a BPMN workflow, with swimlanes for:

Here’s how it flows:

psst…. Like the diagram? we use BPMN within our lovely process engine, here’s why we think you should use BPMN to capture your processes too.

Why not let AI send the email directly?

Tempting, right?

But that’s risky:

Putting a human in the loop adds safety. They’re the final check before anything goes out.

*Prompt injection and LLM security is a rapidly evolving field, trust me – I’m forever reading white-papers and new research. While my example here wouldn’t be a problem with the guards we have in our system, it’s surprisingly easy to abuse LLMs, and you have to tread carefully.

The ah-hah moment

Once people see this in action, something clicks.

You’re not replacing your team. You’re giving them superpowers.

And most importantly – it’s all stitched together in a system that’s transparent, scalable, and controlled.

That’s the difference between bolting on an LLM and building a process that actually works.

Want to do this in your business?

This is exactly what we help our clients with.

  • Designing business processes using BPMN
  • Embedding LLMs where they make sense
  • Using automation to eliminate grunt work
  • Keeping humans in the loop where it counts

“You don’t have to choose between AI and automation... you just need the right system to bring them together.”

Peter Holroyde

About The Author

Peter Holroyde - Director

Pete brings robust security expertise backed by his credentials as an Offensive Security Certified Professional (OSCP). With his strategic vision, Pete ensures our software architectures are secure and scalable, underpinning our clients' trust in our solutions.